Login   |      Register
English    中文


The dataset of risk assessment of ice-snow disaster in southern China


The dataset of risk assessment of ice-snow disaster in southern China

Label :

Date: 2018-05-31

View counts: 7035

Browse document: Browse document

Download Dataset: Log in

Risk assessment of ice-snow disaster contributed to understand the probability and spatial distribution of that, which was of great significance for disaster prevention and reduction work. In this dataset, five indicator factors including daily average temperature, daily average precipitation, elevation, slope direction, and slope were selected to participate in the assessment work. The expert knowledge score method was used to determine the weights of the four indicators of precipitation, elevation, slope, and aspect. The average temperature was regarded as the most critical factor, which decided whether the area suffered from ice-snow disaster. The risk assessment value of ice-snow disaster was calculated, which was normalized. The dataset could be used for post-disaster related research.

Topicategory
Earth Science
Format
tif
Time begin
2008/1/10
Time end
2008/2/2
Organization
Institute of geographic sciences and natural resources research, CAS.
Access constraints
Fully shared
Contributor agency
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Contributor email
wangxc.15s@igsnrr.ac.cn
Country id
CN
Data citation
The dataset of risk assessment of ice-snow disaster in southern China. Disaster Risk Reduction Knowledge Service of International Knowledge Centre for Engineering Sciences and Technology (IKCEST) under the Auspices of UNESCO,2018.5.20.http://drr.ikcest.org/info/993ab.
Data record num
77.7 MB
Resperson name
Service group of Disaster Risk Reduction Knowledge Service System of IKCEST
Responsible address
A11 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing
Responsible email
ikcest-drr@lreis.ac.cn
Responsible postcode
100101
Responsible telephone
010-64889048-8006

    Sign in for comments!

Comment list ( 0 )

 

Information evaluation