Military Intelligence Satellites

Remote Sensing Tutorial Introduction - Part 2 Page 26e

NOTE: THIS PAGE HAS BEEN PREPARED BY NICHOLAS M. SHORT; WHILE SOME OF ITS CONTENT IS RELATED TO COMPARABLE TOPICS PRESENTED IN APPENDIX A (MODERN HISTORY OF SPACE) CONTRIBUTED BY AIR FORCE ACADEMY PERSONNEL, THE INFORMATION GIVEN HERE HAS BEEN ENTIRELY DETERMINED BY THIS WRITER WHO ACCEPTS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS VERACITY AND PERTINENCE.


This page is devoted entirely to one of the prime uses of remote sensing that has driven the entire technology since the early days of the entry of satellites into space. Depending almost exclusively on imaging capabilities, “spy satellites” have been orbited by the hundreds (by several countries) to gather military intelligence or information about terrorist activities. Visible, Near-Infrared; Thermal Infrared, and Radar sensors are applied to gathering information about ground targets and activities of national security significance. Many of the military or intelligence satellites, up until recently, have had superior resolutions when compared with Space Agency systems.


Military Intelligence Satellites

Looking down and out (as from a mountain) to survey the battlefield for information useful to military leaders goes back to ancient times. In Napoleonic times, the French used observation balloons to scan their foes before and during battles. This technique was often a factor in the U.S. Civil War. By the First World War, airplanes and dirigibles were employed over enemy lines and their staging areas and cities as platforms from which aerial photography provided reconnaissance and intelligence pertinent to the content of battle. This approach was much expanded during the Second World War, as for example the follow-ups to a bombing raid to assess damage to the target. With the advent of rockets and then satellites, observations of both military and political activities on the ground became possible, ushering in the so-called Age of Spy Satellites. Besides surveillance of a wide variety of targets of interest to military intelligence units (in the United States, these include the Department of Defense, the CIA, the National Security Agency, and Homeland Defense), satellites can now assist in areas other than simply observing features on the ground - this includes communications, meteorology, oceanography, location (Global Position Systems [GPS]), and Early Warning Systems (none of these latter applications will be discussed on this page). In addition to satellites, manned aircraft continue to be platforms and in recent years UAV’s (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) such as drones have assumed some of the intelligence-gathering tasks.

As one would suspect, there is extensive coverage of “spy satellites” on the Internet, although much information remains classified and thus not released to the public. On this page, only the broadest outline of the history of military intelligence operations from the air and space in the last 50 years will be treated, along with some representative image examples that are now declassified into the public domain. The reader is offered these five Internet sites as among the best found by the writer. Two top the list: 1) An overview (click on that link) prepared by Federation of American Scientists, with an offshoot or link from the same organization that shows specific imagery; and 2) this site, with an information history supported by good imagery, produced by a group at George Washington University. Two others, simply enumerated here, are also worth a visit: (1); (2). It’s your choice, either visit these first or read further on this page (most images come from these Web pages just cited) and then check out the above sites.

Before moving through this page, we suggest going to one more Web site that specifically includes the effects of spatial resolution in military satellite surveillance. This is again two of the links on the FAS Imint site (1)and (2). The single idea to draw from these illustrations is that military observations work best and reveal the desired intelligence when resolution is a few meters or better. Note what can be found and, more importantly, identified at each resolution level. For nearly four decades the military had high resolution systems that could not be matched by non-military earth observation systems (i.e., there were imposed limits of resolution below which (namely, towards greater/better resolution [picking out smaller objects]) no civilian space agency or private group were permitted to design into the sensors on the satellites they operated). All this changed in the 1990s when the Russians began to sell high resolution (~2 meters) imagery from their SPIN-2 on the open world market. After that the U.S. placed more than 800,000 of its earlier military space photos into the public domain.

Now to some specifics: When one thinks of any postwar spy from the sky incidents, the first and most famous case that many recall was the U-2 high altitude airplane that was shot down over the Soviet Union during President Eisenhower’s second term in which the pilot, Gary Powers, was captured and held for many months. Here is an example of a U-2 photo (from another mission) over a military air base.

U-2 photograph of an unidentified military air base; note the aircraft line up.

The U-2 achieved even more fame during the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, when Pres. John F. Kennedy went to the brink with Soviet Chairman Nikita Krushchev over the installation of Medium and Long Range nuclear rockets in parts of Cuba. The next two U-2 images show the facilities that were in place before the Soviet/Cuban block agreed to remove these weapons (probably avoiding World War III or at least partial annihilation):

The San Cristobal, Cuba missile site on October 14, 1962; U-2 photo.

Another San Cristobal site on October 27, 1962, as the facilities were being dismantled; U-2 photo.

Added to this fleet of spy planes was the SR-71, known as the Blackbird. This photo shows a military storage base in Nicauragua (in 1987):

image3

The first military satellites carried photographic cameras that had high resolution optics. The problem, of course, was that of retrieving the film. It could have been developed onboard like was done with the Lunar Orbiter pictures. Instead, the operators of this type of satellite chose to eject the (undeveloped) film towards Earth, with its container deploying on a parachute when the object entered the upper atmosphere. The film package was then “snatched” in mid-by an airplane sent to its expected point of entry. This seemingly difficult feat was remarkably successful, accomplished most of the time. This diagram shows the sequence:

Diagram showing sequence of stages in parachute drops from a satellite.

The primary group of military satellites used in reconnaissance and surveillance is known as the KeyHole series. The first of these was placed in orbit in 1960 and used the parachute retrieval system until 1972. Each numbered KeyHole mission series consisted of multiple satellites. Different identifiers denoted specific satellite types that varied in launch vehicle, orbital characteristics and satellite instrumentation. For example, the KH-1 through KH-4 series also included the appellation Corona, KH-5 is called the Argon series, and KH-6 the Lanyard. Each involved various numbers of satellites. There were 105 successful Corona missions, which were operated by the U.S. Air Force, with CIA involvement. Spatial resolution, initially about 2 meters with the first KH-1 launch in 1960 to work properly, steadily improved with the higher KH numbers. To illustrate the types of images obtained (as photos) from this early group (that constitute the now declassified images released during the Clinton Administration), first examine this view of Moscow made by a KH-4 pass:

KH-4 Corona Photo of central Moscow in the Soviet Union, with inset showing an enlargement of Red Square.

Next, examine this KH image (specific group unspecified) of a Soviet Airfield.

Early KH photo of a Soviet airfield.

All of the KH satellites, of which more than 150 have been launched, consist of film cameras or electro-optical cameras that view the ground through telescopes. KH-7 and KH-9, the Gambit series, had resolutions of about 7 and 2.5 centimeters respectively. The KH-9 Hexagon satellites had 5 to 10 meter resolutions. It is not clear from any of the Internet sources consulted when 1) parachute drops ceased and 2) when electro-optical scanners replaced film. But, KH-11 is designated as an ELINT type (Electronic Intelligence) and did relay its imagery to receiving stations. The KH-11 Crystal satellites produce both SWIR and Thermal Infrared imagery, suggesting a non-photographic component. The KH-12 series, the last for which some specifications can be found, is reputed to achieve a resolution of 2+ cm, although images of this sharpness haven’t been released. Below are several illustrations of declassified (but less than optimum resolution) KH-11 and KH-12 images:

One of the first KH-11 Crystal images, showing facilities at a Soviet harbor; the streaks to the right suggest scan lines, implying that an electro-optical scanner made this image.

During the 1991 Gulf War, this KH image located vehicles in the Iraqi Hammurabi Tank Division.

Tanks deployed in southern Iraq

Here is one of Saddam Hussein’s palaces, a potential target in any renewed Iraqi conflict.

One of several palaces near Baghdad used by Saddam Hussein.

The next pair shows a military barracks in Serbia before and after an airstrike during the Bosnian conflict.

Belgrade barracks before an air raid.

The same barracks after the raid, showing damage inflicted.

This next image was made by a KH-12 satellite using an improved Crystal sensor to image the Zawahr Kili Al-Bahr terrorist camp in western Afghanistan in 1998

KH-12 image of Afghan terrorist camp.

Thermal infrared imagery proved scarce during the writer’s Internet search. No photo was identified as of this type. But here is one which resembles a thermal IR image. It was taken during the Contra conflict in Nicauragua.

Tanks and armored vehicles in this image (possibly thermal IR) of a facility in Nicauragua.

Radar has special military value because, using the right wavelengths, this active system can “see through” clouds and can operate at night. The U.S’s Lacrosse series consists of a SAR sensor mounted on a very large (reputed to be schoolbus sized) platform that ties to extended solar arrays. No Lacross/Vega images were found from an Internet Search through more than 200 sites - this confirms the highly secretive and classified nature of this system. The first Lacrosse was orbited in 1988; Lacrosse-4 launched in 2000. The speculation is that this radar can achieve 1 meter or better resolution. The next image was made by an airborne SAR (TIER program) which simulates the Lacrosse products:

TIER SAR imagery of Army barracks.

The TESAR (Tactical Enhanced SAR) program has produced these high resolution images: first of shipping crates at a Baltimore, MD harbor; second, the most famed military building in the world - the Pentagon outside Washington. D.C.

TESAR image of Baltimore Harbor dock and adjacent ship

TESAR image of the Pentagon.

Over these past 42 years, and well before, aerial reconnaissance and intelligence surveillance has relied heavily on aircraft (ranging from low flying slow single engine propeller planes to high flying fast jets). A U-2 and an SR-71 example were shown above. In recent years, the military has turned to another aerial method - the use of UAVs - unmanned Aerial Vehicles - to conduct pre-programmed surveys of targets and personnel. Some vehicles are called “drones”. One class of UAVs is the Predator series. Below are two examples of images obtained from so-called gun-mounts, where the camera or sensor is placed at or near the front of the vehicle.

UAV-acquired image of a bridge being destroyed in Kosovo.

Serbian fighters surrendering in Bosnia; UAV image.

Finally, intelligence imagery has come full circle. Among the first satellites launched were those used for military purposes. The experience with this technology was invaluable to NASA and other space agencies in developing their (until recently, lower resolution) earth-observers. But, with the Russian declassification followed by orbiting of civilian commercial satellites, e.g., IKONOS and Quickbird, high resolution imagery (1 to 4 meter range) has proved to have its military applications and is being purchased by many nations. The U.S. military and the CIA/NSA complex have contracted with these companies to obtain imagery, especially since the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. We close with this one example of an Afghanistan Taliban Air Force base at Baghram, north of Kabul. This is an IKONOS product:

IKONOS image of the airfield at Baghram, Afghanistan, showing deployment of MIG fighters.

This availability of high resolution satellite images from unrestricted civilian sources has another important ramification: Images of possible military value can now be purchased by any country. Most nations cannot afford their own spy satellite programs but IKONOS, Quickbird and other private company products are affordable.

font >We leave this page with a set of three examples of such imagery that have been gathered by Quickbird 2 (DigitalGlobe) in its now routine coverage of Baghdad, Iraq during 2002 and 2003 in anticipation of a possible invasion of that country by the U.S. military (and, probably other cooperating nations) as an initiative to topple the government of Saddam Hussein. Read the captions of each image for details.

Most of Baghdad, Iraq, in a moderate resolution Quickbird image

An enlargement of Quickbird imagery (4 meter resolution) show palaces and other buildings along or near the Tigris River.

The Al-Sijood Palace, one of the principal residences of Saddam Hussein, along the Tigris River (see its location in the image above).

So, the question of the day: Can anything really be private anymore?

Finally, for still more information on security-based surveillance from space, we suggest you check out the Global Security Organization web site.


Primary Author: Nicholas M. Short, Sr. email: nmshort@nationi.net